May 25, 2022
For Immediate Release
Real Estate Investment Trust:
MIRAI Corporation
Michio Suganuma, Executive Director
(Securities Code: 3476)
Asset Management Company:
Mitsui Bussan & IDERA Partners Co., Ltd.
Michio Suganuma, Representative Director, President
Contact: Nobuaki Takuchi, Executive Director, CFO
TEL: +81-3-6632-5950
Notice Concerning Disposition of Real Estate Trust Beneficiary in Japan
(“Comfort Hotel Nagano”)
Mitsui Bussan & IDERA Partners Co., Ltd. (hereinafter the “Asset Manager”), the asset management company of MIRAI Corporation (hereinafter “MIRAI”) announces that MIRAI has decided to make disposition (hereinafter the “Disposition”) of an asset as follows.
1. Overview of the Disposition
Name of the Asset to be Disposed |
Comfort Hotel Nagano (Hereinafter the “Asset to be Disposed”.) |
Agreement Date (Note 1) |
May 25, 2022 |
Disposition Date (Note 2) |
May 31, 2022 |
Disposition Price (A) (Note 3) |
670 million yen |
Book Value (B) (Note 4) |
635 million yen |
Difference between (A) and (B) (Note 5) |
34 million yen |
Buyer |
Ichigo Hotel REIT Investment Corporation |
Settlement Method |
The entire amount will be received and delivered on the Disposition Date. |
Brokerage |
Yes (For more details, please refer to 6. “Overview of Brokerage”.) |
(Note 1) “Agreement Date” is the signing date of the sale and purchase agreement with the buyer.
(Note 2) “Disposition Date” is the date stated on the sale and purchase agreement as scheduled date of disposition.
(Note 3) “Disposition Price” shows the sale and purchase value of the Asset to be Disposed that is stated in the sale and purchase agreement entered with the buyer. The sale and purchase value does not include national or local consumption tax or expenses necessary for the disposition, and it is rounded down to the nearest million yen. The same shall apply hereinafter.
(Note 4) “Book Value” is the assumed book value at the Disposition Date rounded off to the nearest million yen.
(Note 5) It is a reference value calculated as the difference between Disposition Price and Book Value, which differs from the profit and loss on disposition.
1
2. Reasons for the Disposition
Points
- Improvement of defensiveness: The Disposition will reduce the hotel ratio of the portfolio to 15.8{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5}.
-
Improvement of profitability:
Disposition of an asset with below portfolio average NOI yield after depreciation. -
Increase in NAV:
Unrealized loss eliminated by disposition at a price higher than book value and appraisal value.
With the aim of achieving sustainable growth in distributions per unit (DPU) and increasing unitholder value, MIRAI is continuously working to improve its portfolio through analysis of cash flow and future potential in individual properties, while being conscious of advancing risk diversification and ensuring profitability and stability of the portfolio.
MIRAI received the intention of acquisition from the buyer and decided on the Disposition based on the comprehensive view of the strategy stated above, long-term portfolio strategy as well as the Disposition Price. Below are the main points that are considered upon the Disposition.
- The Asset to be Disposed faced issues of its yield after depreciation being below the portfolio average as well as the property age. Since the contract with the tenant (operator) is on fixed rent, MIRAI anticipated that even if hotel demand recovered rapidly after the COVID-19 outbreak was under control, it would take a certain amount of time for profitability to improve.
- In the initial phase of the post- COVID-19 strategy, MIRAI intends to control the hotel ratio of the portfolio to a certain level with a view to improve defensiveness, and the Disposition will reduce the hotel ratio from 20.4{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5} as of the end of October 2019 (before the outbreak of the COVID-19) to 15.8{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5}.
- Although the appraisal value as of the fiscal period ended October 31, 2021 (the 11th period) was below the book value, MIRAI is expected to secure disposition gain through disposition at a price above the book value.
- Disposition proceeds is to be utilized for activities that contribute to MIRAI’s mid-andlong-term growth, such as future property acquisitions and value enhancement of existing properties.
(Reference) Price and Profitability of Asset to be Disposed
Acquisition |
Disposition |
Disposition |
NOI Yield after |
|||||||||||||||||
Appraisal Value |
Gain |
NOI Yield |
||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Price |
Price |
Depreciation |
|||||||||||||||||
(million yen) |
(million yen) |
(Note 2) |
||||||||||||||||||
(million yen) |
(million yen) |
(Note 2) |
||||||||||||||||||
(Note 1) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Comfort Hotel |
580 |
588 |
670 |
0 |
4.7{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5} |
3.1{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5} |
||||||||||||||
Nagano |
||||||||||||||||||||
(Note 1) “Disposition Gain” is estimated figure as of today and subjects to revision due to changes in the future disposition process.
(Note 2) Figures are based on the book value based on actual results for the fiscal period ended October 31, 2021 (the 11th period) (annualized).
3. Details of the Asset to be Disposed
Details of the Asset to be Disposed are as stated in Annual Securities Reports “Part 1: Fund Information / [1] Fund Overview / 5 Operating Conditions / (2) Investment Assets” dated on January 28, 2022, prepared by MIRAI (Japanese language only).
2
4. Overview of the Real Estate Appraisal Report
Overview of the Real Estate Appraisal Report
Appraisal Value |
588 million yen |
|||||||||||
Appraiser |
Daiwa Real Estate Appraisal Co., Ltd |
|||||||||||
Appraisal Date |
October 31, 2021 |
|||||||||||
(million yen) |
||||||||||||
Item |
Details |
Remarks, etc. |
||||||||||
Value based on income approach |
588 |
|||||||||||
Value based on the direct capitalization method |
588 |
|||||||||||
Operating revenues |
||||||||||||
Potential gross revenues: Sum of (a) through (d) |
||||||||||||
(a)Rental revenues from rooms for rent |
||||||||||||
including common area charges |
||||||||||||
(b)Utilities revenues |
||||||||||||
(c)Parking revenues |
||||||||||||
(d)Other revenues |
||||||||||||
Losses from vacancy, etc. |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
(Note) |
|||||||||||
Maintenance expenses |
||||||||||||
Utilities expenses |
||||||||||||
Repair expenses |
||||||||||||
PM fees |
||||||||||||
Advertisement and leasing expenses, etc. |
||||||||||||
Taxes and public dues |
||||||||||||
Property and casualty insurance premiums |
||||||||||||
Other expenses |
||||||||||||
Net operating income |
33 |
|||||||||||
Investment gains on lump-sum payment |
0 |
Assessed based on comprehensive view of the management status of lump- |
||||||||||
sum payment from both investment management and funding aspects. |
||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
4 |
Reported based renewal expenses on engineering report which was judged |
||||||||||
reasonable while giving consideration to construction management fee. |
||||||||||||
Net cash flow |
29 |
|||||||||||
Capitalization rate |
5.0{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5} |
Assessed based on comprehensive view of location, condition of the |
||||||||||
property and other factors. |
||||||||||||
Value based on DCF method |
588 |
|||||||||||
Discount rate |
4.8{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5} |
Assessed based on comparison against discount rate on other similar real |
||||||||||
estate transactions and return on other financial products. |
||||||||||||
Terminal capitalization rate |
5.2{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5} |
Assessed considering the cap rate and the marketability of the property at |
||||||||||
the end of analysis period. |
||||||||||||
Value based on cost approach |
272 |
|||||||||||
Ratio of land |
61.8{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5} |
|||||||||||
Ratio of building |
38.2{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5} |
|||||||||||
Other matters to which the appraiser pays attention in the |
Not applicable |
|||||||||||
appraisal |
||||||||||||
(Note) Consent for disclosure regarding the financial detail was not obtained from the tenant. Therefore, except in instance where it was deemed that no harm would result from disclosure, the information is not disclosed.
3
5. Overview of Buyer
Name |
Ichigo Hotel REIT Investment Corporation |
|
Address |
1-1-1 Uchisaiwaicho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo |
|
Representative |
Osamu Miyashita, Executive Director |
|
Business Description |
The assets of the investment corporation are managed primarily as investments in specified assets such as |
|
real estate (assets specified in Article 2, Paragraph 1 of the Investment Trust Law) |
||
Total Capitalization |
31,897 million yen (as of January 31, 2022) |
|
Date of Establishment |
July 22, 2015 |
|
Net Assets |
31,940 million yen (as of January 31, 2022) |
|
Total Assets |
59,393 million yen (as of January 31, 2022) |
|
Major Shareholder |
Custody Bank of Japan, Ltd., Trust Account (10.5{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5}) |
|
and Share |
The Master Trust Bank of Japan, Trust Account (9.6{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5}) |
|
Ichigo Trust Pte. Ltd. (4.3{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5}) |
||
Relationships between the company and MIRAI and the Asset Manager |
||
Capital |
There is no capital relationship to state between the company and MIRAI and the Asset Manager. |
|
Personal |
There is no personnel relationship to state between the company and MIRAI and the Asset Manager. |
|
Business |
There is no business relationship to state between the company and MIRAI and the Asset Manager. |
|
Relevance to |
The company does not fall under a related party of MIRAI or the Asset Manager. |
|
related party |
||
6. Overview of Brokerage
The broker is a Japanese corporation, however the name is not disclosed because its consent has not been obtained. The broker is not defined as a related party, etc. in Article 201, Paragraph 1 of the Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations (Act No. 198 of 1951, as amended), and not an interested party under the stakeholder transaction rule of the Asset Manager.
7. Transactions with Interested Parties, etc.
There is no transaction with interested parties.
8. Future Outlook
The effect of the Disposition on its management situation in the fiscal period ending October 31, 2022 (the 13th fiscal period) is minor and there is no change to the forecasts.
(End)
This press release is the English translation of the announcement in Japanese on MIRAI’s website. However, no assurance or warranties are given for the completeness or accuracy of this English translation.
Reference Material: Portfolio List after the Disposition
4
Reference Material: Portfolio List after the Disposition
Asset |
Asset |
Acquisition Price |
Ratio |
|||
Area |
Property Name |
(million yen) |
({4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5}) |
Acquisition Date |
||
Category |
Type |
|||||
(Note 1) |
(Note 2) |
|||||
Office |
Tokyo |
Shinagawa Seaside Park Tower |
20,288 |
12.4 |
December 16, 2016 |
|
(quasi-co-ownership 63.4{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5}) (Note 3) |
||||||
Office |
Tokyo |
Kawasaki Tech Center |
23,182 |
14.1 |
December 16, 2016 |
|
Office |
Tokyo |
Shinjuku Eastside Square |
10,000 |
6.1 |
December 16, 2016 |
|
(quasi-co-ownership 5{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5}) (Note 3) |
||||||
Office |
Tokyo |
Tokyo Front Terrace |
10,592 |
6.5 |
October 26, 2017 |
|
(quasi-co-ownership 50.2{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5}) (Note 3) |
||||||
Office |
Nagoya |
MI Terrace Nagoya-Fushimi |
8,886 |
5.4 |
June 1, 2018 |
|
Office |
Others |
Orico Hakataeki Minami Building |
1,680 |
1.0 |
August 1, 2018 |
|
Office |
Tokyo |
My Square Building |
2,800 |
1.7 |
December 25, 2019 |
|
Office |
Others |
Hiroshima Rijo-dori Building |
2,250 |
1.4 |
March 31, 2020 |
|
Office |
Osaka |
BizMiiX Yodoyabashi |
2,041 |
1.2 |
November 1, 2018 |
|
Office |
Osaka |
TCA Building |
2,120 |
1.3 |
January 28, 2021 |
|
Office |
Others |
Ehime Building/Hiroshima |
2,780 |
1.7 |
January 12, 2022 |
|
Retail |
Tokyo |
Shibuya World East Building |
3,200 |
2.0 |
December 16, 2016 |
|
Retail |
Tokyo |
THINGS Aoyama |
2,912 |
1.8 |
January 9, 2020 |
|
Retail |
Others |
MI Cube Sendai Clisroad |
1,330 |
0.8 |
March 31, 2020 |
|
Core Asset |
Retail |
Tokyo |
AEON Kasai (Note 3) |
9,420 |
5.7 |
December 16, 2016 |
Retail |
Osaka |
MEGA Don Quijote Izumi-Chuo |
3,000 |
1.8 |
December 16, 2016 |
|
Retail |
Osaka |
CAINZ MALL Hikone (land) |
3,598 |
2.2 |
March 31, 2021 |
|
Retail |
Others |
Maxvalu Takatori (land) |
950 |
0.6 |
March 31, 2021 |
|
Retail |
Tokyo |
Tsurumi Fuga 1 (Note 3) |
5,300 |
3.2 |
January 12, 2022 |
|
Retail |
Nagoya |
BIGMOTOR Ginan (land) |
1,080 |
0.7 |
January 12, 2022 |
|
Hotel |
Others |
Hotel Sunroute Niigata |
2,108 |
1.3 |
December 16, 2016 |
|
Hotel |
Others |
Daiwa Roynet Hotel Akita |
2,042 |
1.2 |
December 16, 2016 |
|
Hotel |
Others |
Super Hotel Sendai / Hirosedori |
1,280 |
0.8 |
December 16, 2016 |
|
Hotel |
Osaka |
Super Hotel Osaka / Tennoji |
1,260 |
0.8 |
December 16, 2016 |
|
Hotel |
Tokyo |
Super Hotel Saitama / Omiya |
1,123 |
0.7 |
December 16, 2016 |
|
Hotel |
Osaka |
Super Hotel Kyoto Karasuma Gojo |
1,030 |
0.6 |
December 16, 2016 |
|
Hotel |
Nagoya |
Ise City Hotel Annex |
1,800 |
1.1 |
March 1, 2018 |
|
Hotel |
Others |
Comfort Hotel Kitakami |
820 |
0.5 |
March 1, 2018 |
|
Hotel |
Tokyo |
Hotel Wing International Select Ueno |
3,720 |
2.3 |
May 15, 2018 |
|
/Okachimachi |
||||||
Hotel |
Others |
Smile Hotel Naha City Resort |
4,000 |
2.4 |
November 1, 2018 |
|
Hotel |
Others |
Smile Hotel Hakataeki-Mae |
3,800 |
2.3 |
November 1, 2018 |
|
Hotel |
Nagoya |
Smile Hotel Nagoya-Sakae |
2,950 |
1.8 |
November 1, 2018 |
|
Growth Asset |
||||||
(Core-plus |
Retail |
Osaka |
Mi-Nara |
4,944 |
3.0 |
October 26, 2017 |
Asset) |
||||||
Industrial |
Osaka |
Rokko Island DC |
7,996 |
4.9 |
November 1, 2018 |
|
(quasi-co-ownership 92.45{4e908c29df01d999f087e4f922633998e2ded1c72f05851cd6252034960daee5}) (Note 3) |
||||||
Growth Asset |
Industrial |
Tokyo |
Odawara Material Storage and Delivery Center (land) |
2,300 |
1.4 |
March 1, 2021 |
(New Type |
||||||
Asset) |
Industrial |
Tokyo |
Yokohama-Daikokucho Maintenance Center (land) |
1,490 |
0.9 |
March 25, 2022 |
Educational |
Tokyo |
Tokyo Eiseigakuen Senmongakko |
3,900 |
2.4 |
January 9, 2020 |
|
Total |
163,974 |
100.0 |
– |
(Note 1) “Acquisition Price” shows the purchase and sale value of each asset to be acquired that is stated in the sale and purchase agreement entered with the sellers. The purchase and sale values do not include national or local consumption tax or expenses necessary for the acquisition, and it is rounded down to the nearest million yen. Although the acquisition price of “Mi-Nara” on its sales and purchase agreement is 4,100 million yen, the acquisition price is defined as total investment amount of 4,944 million yen including the additional investment made following the acquisition for the renewal of the property. For “Mi-Nara”, the total investment including the additional investment of 4,944 million yen is defined as acquisition price. Also, the acquisition price of “BizMiix Yodoyabashi” on its sale and purchase agreement is 1,750 million yen, the
5
This is an excerpt of the original content. To continue reading it, access the original document here.
Disclaimer
Mirai Corporation published this content on 25 May 2022 and is solely responsible for the information contained therein. Distributed by Public, unedited and unaltered, on 25 May 2022 16:12:58 UTC.
Publicnow 2022
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Technical analysis trends MIRAI CORPORATION
Short Term | Mid-Term | Long Term | |
Trends | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral |
Income Statement Evolution
Mean consensus | – |
Number of Analysts | 0 |
Last Close Price | 51 000,00 |
Average target price | |
Spread / Average Target | – |
link